No, absolutely not!
I simply got stopped in the tracks trying to find a satisfactory way of adding named arguments to it. I need that feature to consider it complete.
However, two new old topics will probably be raging in my skull in the future:
- Static types, because defining red-black trees that are balanced by construction makes so much sense (and it may finally help me understand those pesky trees).
- Interactive execution, because Roly Perera.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Real names (or handles), please. Anonymous comments are likely to be ignored.